It is high time I shall have read ALL purchased books in my home

Hi guys, I wanna issue a notice over there which may make you in dismay:

My analog domestic book count reaches 2000 in frequency count.
My digital book count approaches 1TB (1024GB).

So if I don’t read them all FROM NOW ON, it will be too late.

I shall cease update all my blog for a while until further notice hereof.

Wanna know the reason why?

Simple. My enemy, 港大 CS (2009-2010 Year 2) 狗公袁嘉康, incites me:

http://xangaspy.net/index.php?q=patyuen&limit=5&ac=a&advanced=yes

2009-10-25 (12:01 PM) -

我要搏盡，比現在讀更加多更加多的書，要繼續努力和努力。這幾日的經歷話給我知，我現在的程度還是很不夠……要再加點努力
在書中……才能不再妄想，才能給我平刻的寧靜
不可以再任性，讓自己再亂來
嗯!
ps 要好好計劃一下自己的將來了

He (It) is quite imbecile. He never knows what book he should read for good. You know, he is an ISFJ and thus he is quite utilitarian and opportunistic. Indeed, he means he wanna have a drill on computer studies, which is philistine. To do up this busybody, I must get serious from now on.

認真? 你就輸了! 

本人現正宣告香港網絡大典的「林智潤」條目內容失去時效

Original EVCHK Post:
http://evchk.wikia.com/wiki/doraemonserv2

Studying its modification history:
http://evchk.wikia.com/index.php?title=%E6%9E%97%E6%99%BA%E6%BD%A4&action=history

Current date is 2009-10-24, but the post never get updated by EVCHK admins (ACG fans as busybody university playboys/dogmen) after 2008-07; Not only this, there are many fatals points in their discourses that are misleading, fabricated, irrelevant and breaching moral standards:

1. I use 林智潤 not as nickname, but for my ex-TYIVE social workers’ easy reference in mysinablog, etc.

So the following description is invalid:

“不斷主動在網上提及(疑似)個人真實姓名”

2. My ideology of otakus has a set nomenclature “Ojalytician”, not “Okadaian” by wild guess from my mysinablog blog title “Okadaian Otakuism by Male LCY”. Therefore, I do not at all support Okada Toshio(岡田斗司夫).

So the following description lack objectivity:

“有動漫迷批評林已歪曲了岡田派一貫的精神理念，他只是意圖營造懷才不遇、對社會存在威脅之個人形象，甚至假借「御宅族」之名，滿足自己那些與御宅族無關的偏激想法”

3. My branches of theories in OJA STUDIES only have 2: Core Theory, Doremotional Studies, not four.

So the following description is simply plagiarism of my edit history:

“根據其網誌內容，「龜相學」可分為四大範疇:

1. 龜相分析學 (Ojalytics)
2. 龜理學 (The Theory of Doremotions)
3. 潛龜論 (The Theory of Toitoise)
4. 龜理學研究 (Doremotional Studies)

他更為此創造了虛擬的龜相學會考及高考課程大綱與試題”

4. I seldom proofread in WWW. This does not equal my having poor English proficiency. Simply, what online media I use lacks validation tools so that minor typos (e.g. lacking “s” or misusing “an” in an embedded edit) repeats many times.

So the following description is NOT clear and inciting:

“有網民指，林的英文文法錯處頗為嚴重“

5. I only criticize those abusing arts (including philosophy) as “文科閪”. One cannot conclude that I hate arts because social sciences – what I am interested in – is a blend of arts and sciences. Since social sciences are part of humanities, my criticism is piercing institutional veil and thus person-orientated instead of vague domains. Also, according to MBTI, what I criticizes are ISFJs and ESFJs that use extraverted intuition(直覺–>模仿) and introverted sensing(感性–>感情用事).

So the following made-up description commits fallacy of overgeneralization:

“他認為文科是「任意的、直覺的和主觀的」，而且「虛偽和感性」，理科則重視技術和邏輯，更認為只有理科生才能成為真正的御宅族。”

6. 空穴來風, 必有後因

So the following made-up description is unjustified:

“因知日部屋拒絕刊登他的一篇文章，而向「屋主」吳偉明無理發難，曾聲言永不向吳偉明道歉”

7. 香港網絡大典是娛樂, 其生動傳記內容大多失實及含影射成份

So the following reference EVCHK admins quoted is a manifestation of blacking my name by improper analogy with psychotic texts:

“與之類似的網上言論: 腦部聲音收發機”

8. EVCHK admins have favoritism towards CUHKACS

So the following reference EVCHK admins quoted is not worth trusting:

“與之相反的網上言論: 與「御宅將變成希特勒」相反的立論: 知日部屋…”